Haynes and Blanchett collaborate again on Carol, a film treatment of Patricia Highsmith’s novel The Price of Salt (a much more interesting title if you ask me). Interestingly, Blanchett entered the popular consciousness in another Highsmith adaptation, Anthony Minghella’s The Talented Mr. Ripley. Blanchett had already been nominated for the Academy Award for Elizabeth when she appeared as the memorably nosy Meredith in Ripley, but Ripley is likely the first time mainstream audiences sat up and took notice of her crackerjack blend of Golden Age moxie and arch feminism.
Ripley is a Hitchcockian potboiler (akin to Highsmith’s Strangers on a Train, which was adapted by Hitchcock) and translates mid-century Freudian psychosexual turmoil into high-crime intrigue; conversely, Carol keeps its heartache and indiscretions grounded in the crushing civility of Atomic Age Americana.
Blanchett’s Carol Aird is a moneyed Manhattan suburbanite, married to a doting and suffocating husband, Harge (Super 8‘s Kyle Chandler, an Arrow Collar/James Garner-paper doll of a fellow). However, she worships their only daughter, Rindy. (Yes, this is the kind of movie where characters have names like Harge and Rindy, smoke cigarettes from silver cases, drink martinis at lunch, and wear driving gloves. all. the. time.)
We learn that Carol has recently had an affair with childhood friend (and Rindy’s godmother) Abby (an ever-luminous Sarah Paulson – 12 Years a Slave, American Horror Story), a fling that has sent Harge into a male ego death spiral, even though the relationship is over and Abby has transitioned from paramour back to confidante. This sets the stage for Carol, while purchasing a Christmas present for her daughter, to “meet cute” with a darling department store clerk (and amateur photographer) Therese Belivet (deftly portrayed by The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo‘s Rooney Mara – imagine an alternate universe where Audrey Hepburn plays a Sapphic “Rory Gilmore” who happens to work at Bloomingdale’s and is partial to wearing multi-colored tam hats).
What the film delivers is a claustrophobic yet sophisticated era, in which decorum rules the day to the detriment of one’s soul. The film moves at a glacial pace, which I suspect is entirely by design, as these two women circle each other, transfixed by their forbidden attraction.
I will add, though, that I had zero understanding of why these women loved one another, other than that the film’s narrative required it. Both Blanchett and Mara have such delicious presence, but neither of them seem to be having one damn bit of fun. There is just no joy here. Again, maybe that’s the point, but rounding into the second hour when this dynamic duo launches into an aimless road trip (that ends up in Waterloo, Iowa, of all places), I just didn’t feel the spark.
The love Carol has for daughter Rindy is palpable (I dare you to keep a dry eye when Chandler and Blanchett have a pas de deux in their lawyers’ office over custody of the child), but I was ambivalent about the connection between Carol and Therese.
Haynes’ films are chilly and soapy. That’s part of his Douglas Sirk schtick, and he uses that retro frame as postmodern commentary on what we have gained and what we have lost as a society. In Haynes’ world, there is always a price for liberty, but, part of the issue with Carol, is that I never found myself invested enough in the main characters to feel their pain.
Blanchett and Mara are doing great actorly work, particularly in their early scenes. Blanchett strikes a delicate balance of detached heartache and predatory lust, while Mara offers a loving portrayal of a kid coming to grips with her place in a world that can be devastatingly cruel to women of any stripe. Yet, I never totally buy them as people. The first lunch date between Carol and Therese is a hoot; Carol confidently orders creamed spinach, poached eggs, and a dry martini, and Therese blankly looks at the server as says, “I’ll have the same,” later wailing, “I barely even know what to order for lunch!” as a comic indicator of the deep waters in which she now finds herself.
I wish Haynes had the willingness to give us more of that movie, one in which two humans find a confidence and a comfort through the wit and humor of shared experience and mutual anxiety. As it is, Carol feels a bit like a film trapped in the amber of nostalgic male panic.__________________
Reel Roy Reviews is now TWO books! You can purchase your copies by clicking here (print and digital). In addition to online ordering at Amazon or from the publisher Open Books, the first book is currently is being carried by Bookbound, Common Language Bookstore, and Crazy Wisdom Bookstore and Tea Room in Ann Arbor, Michigan and by Green Brain Comics in Dearborn, Michigan. My mom Susie Duncan Sexton’s Secrets of an Old Typewriter series is also available on Amazon and at Bookbound and Common Language.
grrrreat review…honest…changed one word to INTO? highlighted below?????
always the English corrector thank you . Happy New Year Susie
🙂 my mom taught me everything I know! I always appreciate her careful eye
Thanks! I always appreciate how carefully you read these! Love you
geesh…my response appeared appeared here? me sounding like a schoolmarm? ah, well… recommendation for paragraph four? you tell me if I am correct? I can handle that! “,,,a fling that has sent Harge in (into?) a male ego death spiral…” TERRIFIC REVIEW…I just suffered through the “THE H8FUL 8” or whatever the damned title is and having no idea BTW what that title even refers to as I kept counting the main players as they met their gory demises….still scratching my head? 8th Quentin T. movie? 8 despicable humans? way more than 8! possibly abominable as well as h8ful…ha!!! and caught benedict in ABOMINABLE BRIDE…(pardon the word association?). wondering if filmmakers are getting too creative for their own good? I don’t attend movies to become all confused…and wow, I am…should have gone to see CAROL instead obviously.
I agree with you about filmmakers getting a little too artsy. I found myself confused a few times watching Carol, and it was about as straightforward as they come. I feel like filmmakers think it’s a come down if they’re just direct and clear. I actually think that should be their desired end. Thanks for the correction! I have fixed that sentence now. And sorry to hear the hateful eight is not much fun. We almost saw that last night, but then talked ourselves out of it.
Love the review, warm, but not sure if it’s the movie I want to see. Not from your review it was straight forward and direct however I have seen the trailer and it just wasn’t my cup of tea. Have a good week Roy and thanks for sharing.
Yeah, I’m not sure it’s a movie anybody would really enjoy. It felt like homework. And wasn’t very much fun.
i actually was drawn to it by the trailer, but your review has made rethink this. i love the story idea, but sounds like something huge was lost in the translation to the screen. onward!
It’s a well-made film, but it left me a little cold. I would be curious to know what you think if you end up seeing it.
hey, try a horrible western like I mistakenly did…I am still nervous? ha!
Lol! No thanks! I’m glad you saw that one so I don’t have to!
I just streamed this movie the other day, and I could not agree more with your review! I’m afraid I was too tired for the glacial pace at which the movie plodded, that I didn’t make it all the way through. I will try again, next time with coffee! 🙂
I’m so relieved to hear you say that. I thought I was the only one. I wanted to like it. And I do think it created a compelling atmosphere, but it was just so boring.